Johann Hari on Kenneth Tong: the journalist as friend to SOME mentally ill people
Johann Hari gets much love on Twitter. He’s the cleverest boy in class as I’ve written before but his grandstanding takedown of self-confessed sociopath and full-time dangerous fuckwit Kenneth Tong isn’t the Ali-knocks-out-Frasier triumph some people are making it out to be. It’s Hari letting a fool hang himself and pulling the quotes together effectively.
No doubt Johann Hari is a good writer, sometimes a bloody good writer indeed. And I will admit straight up that I am jealous of the platform he has. But that Kenneth Tong interview? An easy target taken down easily and what’s more: that gives Tong even more publicity.
All right thinking people know that promoting eating disorders whether it’s for some experiment or not is dangerous and profoundly wrong. No one needs to have Johann Hari highlight that for them unless they’re seriously ill already. So he knows some people with eating disorders, so do I. And sure as damn it the world is already buzzing with triggers for people with serious body issues.
Red flagging the sociopathic rantings of Mr Kenneth Tong has done nothing to make that better. People who are starving themselves to death don’t need to look far to find the proof they crave that they are doing the right thing, that they are fat and that fat is disgusting
I think Kenneth Tong is an unwell man himself and from his writing, it seems that Johann Hari believes that too. But rather than pulling the interview and putting an end to this little spectacle that Tong has constructed for himself, he published it anyway.
The interview didn’t just appear on Hari’s blog either, it was in The Evening Standard and on the Huffington Post. For all those vulnerable people that didn’t know that Mr Kenneth Tong, the size zero pill merchant, richboy fantasist existing, Johann Hari just acted as his hype man.
In the interview, Hari answers Tong’s question about his own mental health: “‘Do you think I have a mental problem? You can be honest with me,’ he says pleadingly. Yes, I say, I do. You should urgently seek help for your sociopathy.” If Johann genuinely believes that Kenneth Tong is mentally ill then why put him up as a pinata for the chattering classes? It doesn’t seem ethical to me. It’s a journalist elevating himself on the back of a pathetic case, a sick individual who doesn’t deserve to get even more attention.
The ending of Hari’s piece further highlights the paradox of writing a piece about a person you believe is beneath contempt: “So what can we learn from the twisted Twitter-parable of Kenneth Tong? It seems that of you drill down into women’s insecurities and men’s misogynies, even a talentless, spoiled little sociopath can catch the attention of the world, for a few days. It may be new media, but it’s an old, old story.” Yes, Johann, a talentless, spoiled little sociopath who you just got featured on the Huffington Post and in the Evening Standard, see the contradiction?